Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:44
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
S&P 500 scores best May since 1990, but stocks end month with fresh tariff worries - MarketWatch
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
The High Stakes of Kevin Durant’s Closing Act - The Ringer
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
How do I build muscle easily with isometrics?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s something you’ve learned that you think everyone should know, but nobody talks about?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Were knights’ lances practical weapons, or were they just for sports?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How can Substack help creators with their overall business strategy?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Jonas Brothers cancel and move upcoming concerts, including one in North Texas - WFAA